Legal Opinion

State v. MacOmber

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1974PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C.J.

Defendant was charged with the crime of unauthorized use of a vehicle (ORS 164.135). He was found guilty and appealed to the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the judgment of conviction. State v. Macomber, 16 Or App 54, 517 P2d 344 (1973).

Police officers, using a search warrant, appeared at defendant’s truck repair shop and seized a large number of parts of a partially disassembled 1971 Mack log truck. Most of these parts were identified as coming from a truck which had been stolen at "Walterville, Oregon.① Defendant was charged with the violation of ORS 164.135, which provides as follows:

“(1)…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MacOmberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. CivilCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. EastepOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. DouthittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. State v. BrustCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. State v. MacOmberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API