State ex rel. Jeep Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Both parties have appealed to this court. While Jeep *84challenges the imposition of the award, claimant contests the amount. Upon review, we determine that the commission did not abuse its discretion either in finding a YSSR or in granting a fifteen-percent award.

Jeep’s initial propositions involve the specific safety requirement itself, contending that it is neither applicable nor specific. As to the former, Jeep contends that IC-5-08.03(I)(2) is inapplicable since the claimant was not operating the press at the time of injury. This argument is without merit. IC-5-08.03(I)(2) merely states…