Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Burton v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1989No. 88-752PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Per curiam

To successfully assert a VSSR, a claimant must establish that his or her injury resulted from the employer’s failure to comply with a specific safety requirement. State, ex rel. Whitman, v. Indus. Comm. (1936), 131 Ohio St. 375, 6 O.O. 88, 3 N.E. 2d 52. This is a factual question resting exclusively with the commission. State, ex rel. Haines, v. Indus. Comm. (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 15, 58 O.O. 2d 70, 278 N.E. 2d 24. Where its decision is supported by “some evidence,” the commission has not abused its discretion and mandamus will not lie. State, ex rel. Burley, v. Coil Packing, Inc. (1987), 31…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Lewis v. Diamond Foundry Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State ex rel. Haines v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State ex rel. Berry v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lovell v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State Ex Rel. Supreme Bumpers, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Precision Steel Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State ex rel. Lamp v. J.A. Croson Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Byington Builders, Ltd. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API