Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Trydle v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1972No. Nos. 72-394 and 72-395PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brown, J..

In case No. 72-394, relators assert that the death of their son resulted from specific violations of R. 0. 4109.10, 4109.12(D) and 4109.13(E).

They allege that those sections fall within the purview of Section 35, Article II of the Ohio Constitution, which requires additional compensation where there is a violation of a “* * * specific requirement for the protection of the lives, health or safety of employees enacted by the General Assembly * *

To fall within the confines of Section 35, Article II, there must be a determination that the order or enactment is a specific requirement.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Slatmeyer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State ex rel. Truckey v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Commercial Lovelace Motor Freight, Inc. v. LancasterOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State ex rel. Cotterman v. St. Marys FoundryOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State ex rel. Brilliant Electric Sign Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State ex rel. Harris v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State ex rel. Jeep Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API