Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Cincinnati Drum Service, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1990No. 89-553PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The commission determined that appellant violated Ohio Adm. Code 4121:l-5-04(C)(2) and (3). Ohio Adm. Code 4121:l-5-04(C)(2) provides:

“* * * Vertical and inclined belts and their pulleys seven feet or less above floor or platform level shall be guarded in accordance with appendix I.” (Emphasis added.)

Ohio Adm. Code 4121:l-5-04(C)(3) requires:

“* * * Vee belts and their pulleys, where exposed to contact, shall be guarded.” (Emphasis added.)

Appellant’s initial contention is that Ohio Adm. Code 4121:1-5-04 (C)(2) pertaining to vertical and inclined belts and their pulleys is not applicable to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Burton v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State ex rel. Frank Brown & Sons, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Cotterman v. St. Marys FoundryOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State ex rel. Harris v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. B & C MacHine Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State Ex Rel. Weich Roofing, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. State ex rel. Armstrong Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State Ex Rel. B & C MacHine Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State Ex Rel. B & C MacHine Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API