Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Maghie & Savage, Inc. v. Nobel
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 1, 1998No. 95-1366PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
In this case we are asked to determine whether the court of appeals properly found that the commission abused its • discretion. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
Ohio Adm.Code 4121:1-3-10(B) sets forth the relevant definitions as follows:
“(20) ‘Manually propelled mobile scaffold’ means a portable rolling scaffold equipped with casters.
“* * *
“(36) ‘Tube and coupler scaffold’ means an assembly consisting of tubing which serves as posts, bearers, braces, ties, and runner, a base supporting the posts, and special couplers which serve to connect the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Harris v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State ex rel. M. T. D. Products, Inc. v. StebbinsOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State ex rel. Jeep Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Taylor v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Supreme Bumpers, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. R. Bauer & Sons Roofing & Siding, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Camaco, L.L.C. v. Albu (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- State ex rel. Culver v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
- State ex rel. Strawser v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.