Legal Opinion

State v. Hunt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 1, 1978No. 779SC1033PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Judge.

The defendant first assigns as error the trial court’s actions in sustaining the State’s objections to two of his questions to prospective jurors during jury selection. The defendant asked one prospective juror: “[I]f you are firmly convinced the defendant was not guilty, would you permit anything to change your mind or influence you in your decision as to how to vote?” The trial court sustained the State’s objection to this question. At a later point in jury selection, the defendant asked another prospective juror: “Would you allow the fact a considerable number of jurors…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Clozza v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. State v. LouisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. MoroccoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API