Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1981No. 8010SC1156PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in denying his challenge for cause of a prospective juror. Although the record does not contain a transcript of the jury voir dire, it does show that the following proceeding took place in the judge’s chambers:

COURT: Okay. Take this, that during voir dire of the jury by the defendant, the defendant having exercised six preemp-tory [sic] challenges, juror no. 4 responded to the following question —now, can you state what that question was, Mr. Thigpen?

MR. THIGPEN: Whether the juror had formed an opinion as to the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Love v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. NoellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. VirgilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Lamm v. Bissette Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. CorbettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. CliftonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. LongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API