Legal Opinion

State v. Arnold

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 13, 1985No. 357A84PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The defendant brings forward several assignments of error in which he argues that certain evidence was improperly admitted. He also contends that the trial court committed prejudicial error by leaving the courtroom during the final arguments to the jury by counsel. The defendant also contends that the trial court erred in permitting the prosecutor during her argument to refer to the fact that he had brought a Bible into the courtroom. These assignments and contentions are without merit.

The State presented evidence which tended to show that the defendant, Jerry Arnold, is the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. LarrimoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  2. State v. BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. State v. SpaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API