State v. Goines
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHusiciNS, J.
To constitute an assault with intent to commit rape, it is not necessary that the assailant retain such intent throughout the assault. It is sufficient if he at any time during the assault has an intent to gratify his passion upon the prosecutrix at all events, notwithstanding any resistance on her part. State v. Petry, 226 N.C. 78, 36 S.E. 2d 653; State v. Williams, 121 N.C. 628, 28 S.E. 405. “The intent is necessarily an inference to be drawn from the defendant’s acts, and it must be drawn by the jury and not by the judge, when there is any evidence.” State v. Mehaffey, 132 N.C. 1062, 44…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. CaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Tyndall Ex Rel. Tyndall v. Harvey C. Hines Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.