Legal Opinion

State v. Goines

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1968No. 498PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHusiciNS, J.

To constitute an assault with intent to commit rape, it is not necessary that the assailant retain such intent throughout the assault. It is sufficient if he at any time during the assault has an intent to gratify his passion upon the prosecutrix at all events, notwithstanding any resistance on her part. State v. Petry, 226 N.C. 78, 36 S.E. 2d 653; State v. Williams, 121 N.C. 628, 28 S.E. 405. “The intent is necessarily an inference to be drawn from the defendant’s acts, and it must be drawn by the jury and not by the judge, when there is any evidence.” State v. Mehaffey, 132 N.C. 1062, 44…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. CaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. State v. CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Tyndall Ex Rel. Tyndall v. Harvey C. Hines Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API