Legal Opinion

State v. Vinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1975No. 48PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

A prospective juror stated on her voir dire examination that under no circumstances and regardless of the evidence would she return a verdict of guilty if it meant imposition of the death penalty. She was excused for cause, and defendant assigns error on that ground.

There is no merit in this assignment. The juror was properly excused for cause. State v. Monk, 286 N.C. 509, 212 S.E. 2d 125 (1975) ; State v. Ward, 286 N.C. 304, 210 S.E. 2d 407 (1974) ; State v. Honeycutt, 285 N.C. 174, 203 S.E. 2d 844 (1974); State v. Crowder, 285 N.C. 42, 203 S.E. 2d 38 (1974).

*332During jury…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. NoellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. ZunigaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API