State v. Vestal
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Justice.
Denial of Motion for Judgment of Nonsuit
Upon the defendant’s motion for judgment of nonsuit in a criminal action, the question for the court is whether there is substantial evidence of each essential element of the offense charged, or of a lesser offense included therein, and of the defendant’s being the perpetrator of such offense. If so, the motion is properly denied. State v. Rowland, 263 N.C. 353, 139 S.E. 2d 661; State v. Virgil, 263 N.C. 73, 138 S.E. 2d 777; State v. Goins and State v. Martin, 261 N.C. 707, 136 S.E. 2d 97. In making this determination, the evidence must be…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by227 opinions
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
222 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.