Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. USAA Casualty Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 1991No. C006895PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CARR, J.

The critical issue tendered by this appeal is whether an insurer owes a duty to its insureds to disclose within a reasonable time the existence and amount of underinsured insurance coverage which may or may not become operative depending on the adequacy of the available bodily injury liability insurance. If such a duty exists, the specific question on this appeal is whether a factual basis for the breach of that duty has been presented by the respondent herein. We shall find that an insurer owes such a duty and that plaintiff Ramirez on the granting of a new trial was properly…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Minsky v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Dercoli v. Pennsylvania National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Baughman v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Evans v. California Trailer Court, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Salas v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Cassady v. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Donlen v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API