Ramirez v. USAA Casualty Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARR, J.
The critical issue tendered by this appeal is whether an insurer owes a duty to its insureds to disclose within a reasonable time the existence and amount of underinsured insurance coverage which may or may not become operative depending on the adequacy of the available bodily injury liability insurance. If such a duty exists, the specific question on this appeal is whether a factual basis for the breach of that duty has been presented by the respondent herein. We shall find that an insurer owes such a duty and that plaintiff Ramirez on the granting of a new trial was properly…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Minsky v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Dercoli v. Pennsylvania National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Baughman v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Evans v. California Trailer Court, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Salas v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Cassady v. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Donlen v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.