Legal Opinion

Galanty v. Paul Revere Life Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 2000No. S073678PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

—We granted review to consider the effect of a standard incontestability clause that the Insurance Code requires policies of disability insurance to include. (Ins. Code, §§ 10350, 10350.2; except as noted, all further statutory citations are to this code.) The lower courts construed the clause as permitting an insurer to deny coverage for its insured’s disability, caused by AIDS (acquired immune deficiency syndrome), because the insured tested positive for antibodies to HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) before the policy was issued. We reverse.

Facts and Procedural…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Matter of Met. Life Ins. Co. v. ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Jeffrey M. PoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Intel Corp. v. HamidiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Byars v. SCME Mortgage Bankers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Morris v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Kramer v. LOCKWOOD PENSION SERVICES, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  5. Marie Deonier & Associates v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API