Legal Opinion
In Re Pennington
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 26, 2007No. 05-BG-681, 06-BG-891PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
Before us are consolidated recommendations of the Board on Professional Responsibility, one to impose reciprocal discipline on attorney Jill J. Pennington in the form of suspension for thirty days, the other to impose original discipline on attorney N. Frank Wiggins in the form of a suspension for sixty days, thirty days of which would be stayed in favor of unsupervised probation for one year, during which he would be expected to complete a CLE course in legal ethics. Wiggins contests the Hearing Committee’s finding of misconduct, accepted by the Board; Pennington…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McClainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- In Re GubermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re HowesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- In Re Olekanma A. Ekekwe-KauffmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- In Re PelkeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.