Paterson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Martin county, Quinn, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a trial and verdict in favor of plaintiff for $400.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action to recover damages which the plaintiff alleged that he had sustained by the negligence of the defendant as a common carrier in transporting his automobile from Chicago to Fairmont, this state. The automobile was purchased by the plaintiff in Myersdale, Pennsylvania, and on March 25, 1903, it was loaded in good condition by the seller upon a car of the Baltimore & Ohio Railway Company, and transported by that carrier to Chicago, there, by a connecting carrier, the Belt Fine Railway Company, it was delivered to the defendant for transportation over its line to Fairmont. When it was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shriver v. Sioux City & St. Paul RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
- Meyers v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Leo v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Beede v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Wicklund v. AllraumWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Egekvist v. Minnetonka & White Bear Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Hoffman v. PiperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Company A, First Regiment v. HughesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922