Meyers v. McAllister
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Itasca county, McClenahan, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action to recover possession of certain personal property, consisting of a logging outfit. The complaint alleged the plaintiff’s ownership of the property, its value, and that the defendants on November 15, 1903, at Blackduck, this state, took the property from his possession, and detains the same. The answer admitted the taking of a portion of the property, and alleged that the part taken was of the value of $488.20, and no more, and claimed to justify the taking by virtue of an alleged seller’s lien on the property. The reply put in issue the new matter alleged in the answer. Verdict for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Insurance Companies v. WeidesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Stahl v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Papooshek v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Blondel v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Yorks v. MoobergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sullivan v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Krahn v. J. L. Owens Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Tysk v. GriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Holmes v. SchnedlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Liimatainen ex rel. Liimatainen v. BoekenoogenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.