Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Piper

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 5, 1930No. 28,168PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

Plaintiff had a verdict in an action to recover for a breach of warranty in the sale by the defendants to him of a Star automobile. Defendants appeal from an order denying their alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

The principal questions raised and argued by appellants in their brief are (1) the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and (2) whether or not the plaintiff was competent to testify to the value of the automobile purchased by him from the defendants.

We have carefully examined the evidence and find that it supports the allegations…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Egekvist v. Minnetonka & White Bear Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Paterson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Zacherl v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Bukowski v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API