Company A, First Regiment v. Hughes
North Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentBronson, J.
I am of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. I concur in the majority opinion to the extent that it holds the evidence sufficient to support the jury’s findings of the conversion. I disagree with the majority opinion concerning the admissibility of competency of the testimony of the witnesses Captain Welch and Langley.
Many years ago, an armory building was established in Bismarck. Company “A” of the National Guard was quartered there. The personal property involved, located therein, was bought by, or furnished to, the company for its use. The company was the owner. Plaintiff, a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City National Bank of Columbus v. JordanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Needham v. HalversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Graham v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Paterson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Lines v. Alaska Commercial Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.