Legal Opinion

Wicklund v. Allraum

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1922No. 17503PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

-Respondent, as plaintiff, sought by this action to recover damages arising from an automobile collision. The cause was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict for $650, the full amount claimed, and *547from a judgment against them entered thereon, the defendants have appealed.

The first assignment is that the trial court committed error in permitting respondent to testify to the value of his automobile before and after the accident, and in refusing to strike from the issues the claim for damages to the automobile because such claim rested on that testimony. We cannot so hold. In Alexander v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Rankin v. CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Jackson v. InnesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  4. Seckerson v. SinclairNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Seckerson v. SinclairNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. McCurdy v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Klam v. KoppelIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Cunningham v. Town of TietonWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  5. Weber v. West Seattle Land & Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API