Beede v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the municipal court of Minneapolis, Dickinson, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, after a trial and verdict in favor of plaintiff for $262.26.
1Opinion of the Court
START, O. J
Action to recover damages which the plaintiff sustained by the alleged negligence of the defendant, as a common carrier, in the transportation of two carloads of apples. At the close of the evidence the defendant requested the trial court to direct a verdict in its favor. The motion was denied, and the cause submitted to- the jury, and a verdict returned in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant appealed from an order denying its motion for judgment or a new trial.
The principal question on this appeal is whether the verdict is sustained by the evidence.,, The facts were stipulated…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Steinbauer v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Shriver v. Sioux City & St. Paul RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
- Leo v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Shea v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fockens v. United States Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Williamsport Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
- Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. A. Peterson Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1915
- Stolze v. Ann Arbor RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Paterson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.