Legal Opinion

Irwin & Leighton v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 3, 1944No. 44915PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge

Plaintiffs entered into a contract with the defendant for the construction of a Post Office and Court House at Wilmington, Delaware. They sue the defendant for damages for delays caused by (1) failure to furnish models on time; (2) changes made in penthouses and a coping; (3) changes *474made in the Judge’s library; (4) on account of a strike; (5) changes necessary to install an electrical signal system; (6) changes in the counters in the deputy clerk’s and deputy marshal’s offices; and (7) changes to provide for an acoustical tile base in certain of the rooms.

1. Delay due to failure to furnish…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Langevin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  2. Magoba Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  3. Young-Fehlhaber Pile Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. George A. Fuller Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  3. Gordon R. England, Secretary of the Navy v. The Sherman R. Smoot Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  4. Wilner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  5. James Stewart & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API