Legal Opinion
Wilner v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 14, 1992No. 595-89CPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This construction contract case is before the court after trial on the merits. Melvin Wilner, d/b/a Wilner Construction Company (“plaintiff”), seeks recovery for alleged government-caused delay on the critical path of a construction project. Plaintiff contends that the Government delayed work relating to duct revisions, open web joist (“OWJ”) revisions, and smoke detectors while these activities were on the critical path.1 This opinion resolves the *262issue of whether delays attributable to the Government occurred along the project’s critical path and, if so, whether…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Dawco Construction, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- W.M. Schlosser Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Capital Electric Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Melvin Wilner, D/B/A Wilner Construction Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- United States v. Renda Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Gordon R. England, Secretary of the Navy v. The Sherman R. Smoot Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.