Legal Opinion

Young-Fehlhaber Pile Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 6, 1939No. 43841PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeeeN, Judge

On November 10, 1936, the plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant under the terms of which it agreed to furnish all labor and material and perform all work required for reinforcing the south pier of Summit Bridge over the Inland Waterway from the Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and Maryland, for the consideration of $41,783. Plaintiff’s work under the contract was to be completed within 100 days from the date of receipt of written notice to proceed.

Article 19 of the contract provided in part as follows:

Art. 19.. (a) Labor preferences. — With respect to all persons…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Black v. WoodrowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Irwin & Leighton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
  2. York Engineering & Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  3. E. J. Albrecht Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  4. Worsham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  5. York Engineering & Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API