Legal Opinion

Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1947No. S. F. 17299PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Defendant operates a printing plant in San Francisco. Plaintiff was employed by defendant as a salesman of its tariff business from May 1936 to January 1943. For over twenty years before his employment with defendant he conducted a printing business of his own. Defendant had no tariff business when plaintiff entered its employ, and plaintiff built up defendant’s tariff business during the period of his employment to a volume of approximately $50,000 a year. When plaintiff resigned his position with defendant, he notified *563defendant of his decision to exercise an option to purchase at their…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. McAllister v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Frink v. RoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Homestead Supplies, Inc. v. Executive Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. People Ex Rel. State of Cal. v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Contractor's Safety Ass'n v. California Compensation InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. North American Uranium, Inc. v. JohnstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1957
  5. San Jose Abstract & Title Insurance v. ElliottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API