Legal Opinion

Felix v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 13, 1974No. Docket Nos. 2294, 2313, 2314PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN (G. A.), P. J.

These three petitions for mandamus and/or prohibition have been consolidated for argument and decision because they have a common factual base and the solution to each, aside from some minor peripheral considerations, depends upon the resolution of one central question: whether, under the facts, Herrniriió Felix Felix (hereinafter “Felix”) has made an election of remedies to proceed with a workmen’s compensation proceeding filed against Martin Etchamendy (hereinafter “Etchamendy”) pursuant to Labor Code section 3715, 1 thereby being precluded from proceeding against…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Elkins v. DerbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Scott v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Frazier v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Le Parc Community Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Rymer v. HaglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Young v. Libbey-Owens Ford Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API