Felix v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN (G. A.), P. J.
These three petitions for mandamus and/or prohibition have been consolidated for argument and decision because they have a common factual base and the solution to each, aside from some minor peripheral considerations, depends upon the resolution of one central question: whether, under the facts, Herrniriió Felix Felix (hereinafter “Felix”) has made an election of remedies to proceed with a workmen’s compensation proceeding filed against Martin Etchamendy (hereinafter “Etchamendy”) pursuant to Labor Code section 3715, 1 thereby being precluded from proceeding against…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Elkins v. DerbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Scott v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Frazier v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Le Parc Community Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Rymer v. HaglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Young v. Libbey-Owens Ford Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.