Legal Opinion
Busch v. Globe Industries
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 15, 1962No. Civ. 25211PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJefferson, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for defendants in an action for breach of contract. The case was tried by the court, sitting without a jury.
Viewing the evidence favorably to defendants it appears that on or about December 11, 1955, plaintiff Robert H. Busch and defendant Globe Industries, a copartnership consisting of Robert Friedland and Nathan Reis, also known as Nathan Reese, entered into a contract. Under the terms of the agreement plaintiff obtained an exclusive agency distributorship for Globeware (cooking utensils sold by defendant Globe Industries) in 16 eastern states, and the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Groves v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Church of the Merciful Saviour v. Volunteers of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Lohn v. Fletcher Oil Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Hay v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Major v. Western Home InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Kashmiri v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Clark Equipment Co. v. Mastelotto, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Thompson v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.