Legal Opinion
Goodfellow v. Barritt
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 23, 1933No. Docket No. 842PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The appeals which are here presented have been taken by the plaintiff and by one of the defendants, personally and as administratrix of the estate of her husband, who was originally named as a defendant and who died during the pendency of the action, from the modified judgment rendered by the trial court.
Plaintiff’s third amended complaint contains two causes of action. By the first cause of action it is sought to quiet plaintiff’s title to certain real property therein described. By the second cause of action the equitable remedy of reformation is sought to be applied to the deed whereby the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Kleinclaus v. DutardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Austin v. Hallmark Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Vilardo v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Haley v. Santa Fe Land Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.