Legal Opinion

Haley v. Santa Fe Land Improvement Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1935No. Civ. 9499PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIS, J., pro tem.

Respondents, plaintiffs below, brought this action against appellant to recover damages for fraud and deceit in a transaction involving the purchase and sale of lands. The transaction upon which the fraud is predicated took place about January 20, 1926, and the action thereon was commenced October 31, 1932. A general and special demurrer to the amended complaint was overruled, and defendant answered by general and special denials of all the essentials of the complaint, and specially pleaded, among other defenses, the bar of section 338, subdivision 4, of the Code of Civil…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Beeson v. SchlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Haas v. GreenwaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Joe Turner v. Charles H. LundquistCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  3. Helfer v. HubertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Nighbert v. First National Bank of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Vertex Investment Co. v. SchwabacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API