Legal Opinion

Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 28, 1989No. 87-6146PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

This case involves the worldwide television rights to a number of Laurel and Hardy silent films (“the silent subjects”). Appellee’s predecessor in interest, Hal Roach, Inc., and appellant Richard Feiner and Company, Inc. (“Feiner & Co.”) entered into a written agreement to license the television rights to certain of the films to Feiner & Co. for a ten year period with an option to renew the license agreement for a second ten year term. Feiner & Co. subsequently exercised the option.

In 1984 appellee Hal Roach Studios, Inc. (“Hal Roach Studios”) filed a complaint…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Richard E. Loux v. B. J. Rhay, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  5. Kim King and Kent Norman v. Victor AtiyehCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Sumner Peck Ranch, Inc. v. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
  2. United States v. Hector Tafollo-CardenasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Westlands Water Dist. v. US Dept. of InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1992
  4. Xerox Corp. v. Apple Computer, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1990
  5. Allstate Insurance v. LaPoreDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API