Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
This case involves the worldwide television rights to a number of Laurel and Hardy silent films (“the silent subjects”). Appellee’s predecessor in interest, Hal Roach, Inc., and appellant Richard Feiner and Company, Inc. (“Feiner & Co.”) entered into a written agreement to license the television rights to certain of the films to Feiner & Co. for a ten year period with an option to renew the license agreement for a second ten year term. Feiner & Co. subsequently exercised the option.
In 1984 appellee Hal Roach Studios, Inc. (“Hal Roach Studios”) filed a complaint…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Richard E. Loux v. B. J. Rhay, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Kim King and Kent Norman v. Victor AtiyehCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Sumner Peck Ranch, Inc. v. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
- United States v. Hector Tafollo-CardenasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Westlands Water Dist. v. US Dept. of InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1992
- Xerox Corp. v. Apple Computer, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1990
- Allstate Insurance v. LaPoreDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.