Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Wiltzius

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1922No. 17421PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

-This action is on two promissory notes, six hundred dollars each, dated July 7,1920, due four months from their date, bearing interest at eight *638per cent per annum, made by defendant, Henry Wiltzius, to one Dudman, wbo endorsed and delivered them before maturity to the plaintiff, the First National Bank of Medical Lake. The defense was that the notes were procured by fraud on the part of Dud-man, and that the plaintiff was not a holder in due course. No objections are presented to the instructions to the jury. The jury returned a special finding that the plaintiff exercised bad faith in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ireland v. ScharpenbergWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Scandinavian American Bank v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Union Investment Co. v. RosenzweigWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Rohweder v. TitusWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Keith v. Tsue ChongWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Ritzville v. GunningWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Reynolds v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Inland Mortgage & Loan Co. v. CadyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. First National Bank v. DotsonWashington Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API