Legal Opinion

Inland Mortgage & Loan Co. v. Cady

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1926No. 19433. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

This is an action upon a promissory note given to one Dudman for the purchase of mining stock. Similar cases involving the fraudulent transactions of Dudman, by which he procured promissory notes, have been considered by this court ih: First National Bank of Medical Lake v. Wiltzius, 122 Wash. 637, 211 Pac. 275; First National Bank of Ritzville v. Gunning, 127 Wash. 307, 220 Pac. 793; Lovell v. Dotson, 128 Wash. 669, 223 Pac. 1061; First National Bank of Ritzville v. Egbers, 130 Wash. 221, 226 Pac. 492. Dudman, after securing the note from the appellant, procured a written authorization from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lovell v. DotsonWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. First National Bank of Ritzville v. GunningWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. First National Bank v. EgbersWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. First National Bank v. WiltziusWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harris v. SainsburyIdaho Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API