Rohweder v. Titus
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Sullivan, J., entered January 5, 1914, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant, in an action on a promissory note.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
Action to recover on a promissory note. From a verdict and judgment in defendant’s favor, the plaintiff has appealed.
The controlling questions presented by appellant’s assignments of error are whether the trial court erred in overruling his motions for a directed verdict and for a judgment non obstante. The note was executed and delivered to the L. D. McCarthy Auto Company, a corporation, by respondent, for $2,100, on January 2, 1912, and fell due on May 15, 1912. *442Appellant alleged that he purchased the note for value before maturity, and that he is a holder in due course. Respondent denied…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Keene v. BehanWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Ireland v. ScharpenbergWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Gosline v. DryfoosWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Coey v. DarknellWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Union Investment Co. v. RosenzweigWashington Supreme Court · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- National City Bank v. KirkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
- Fisk Rubber Co. v. PinkeyWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Gebby v. CarrilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
- Reynolds v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Banner Meat Co. v. RiegerWashington Supreme Court · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.