Legal Opinion

Scandinavian American Bank v. Johnston

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1911No. 8961PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Neal, J., entered January 29, 1910, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant, in an action on a promissory note.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

Action by Scandinavian American Bank against E. W. Johnston, on a promissory note. From a judgment against it, the plaintiff has appealed.

The controlling assignment is that the trial judge erred in refusing to withdraw the case from the jury, and enter judgment in appellant’s favor. The following facts appear from undisputed evidence: Some time in January, 1909, the respondent, E. W. Johnston, subscribed for $5,000 par value of the capital stock of the Electric Transportation Company, a corporation organized to operate a line of sightseeing automobiles on the streets of Seattle and motor…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Canajoharie National Bank v. DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Collins v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Second National Bank v. WestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. American Exchange National Bank v. New York Belting & Packing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Tescher v. MereaIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fisk Rubber Co. v. PinkeyWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Wells v. DuffyWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. LimprightWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Caldwell v. McGarveyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Conqueror Trust Co. v. SimmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API