Union Investment Co. v. Rosenzweig
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Franklin county, Holcomb, J., entered December 4, 1912, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendants, in an action upon a promissory note.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
This action was brought by the appellant against the respondents to recover on a promissory note. In its complaint, the appellant alleged that the note had been made and delivered by the respondents to McLaughlin Brothers, a partnei'ship, and by the McLaughlin Brothers, endorsed and delivered to it, for value, before maturity, and that it was a holder thereof in due course. The answer was a denial of the allegations of the complaint, and an affirmative plea of fraud in the procurement of the note, failure of consideration, and knowledge on the part of the appellant of the circumstances under…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Richmond v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Keene v. BehanWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Ireland v. ScharpenbergWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Cedar Rapids National Bank v. Myhre Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fisk Rubber Co. v. PinkeyWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Crouch v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Arnett v. SandersonArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- Rohweder v. TitusWashington Supreme Court · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.