Legal Opinion

Ireland v. Scharpenberg

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1909No. 8058PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Hinkle, J., entered December 1, 1908, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action on a promissory note.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiffs are residents of the state of Illinois, engaged in the brokerage and banking business, while the defendants are farmers residing in Spokane county, this state. On the 7th day of May, 1906, the defendants signed a paper writing in words and figures as follows:

Stockholders’ Purchasing Contract

No. 910 Spokane, "Wash., May 7th, 1906.

After a good and satisfactory examination of the Belgian Stallion named Jules D’Or 1635 No. (25894) owned by The Burgess Importing Co., of Wenona, Illinois, and recognizing his value as a means of improving our horse stock, we, the undersigned…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Elwood v. . the Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Canajoharie National Bank v. DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. McNight v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Joy v. . DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Giberson v. JolleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Kneff v. SanfordWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Estate of Philpott v. PhilpottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  3. Scandinavian American Bank v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Bank of Polk v. WoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. National City Bank v. KirkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API