Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Ritzville v. Gunning

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1923No. 17605PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment based upon a directed verdict of the jury in an action brought to recover on a promissory note executed by the appellants. The sole question is whether the appellants presented sufficient evidence in their defense against payment to go to the jury.

The respondent purchased notes before maturity for value. The appellants allege in their affirmative defense, however, that respondent is not a holder in good faith, for two reasons: first, because a conspiracy existed between the payee of the notes and the officers of the respondent; and second, because the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. First National Bank v. WiltziusWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Butte MacHinery Co. v. JeppesenIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Pioneer Trust Co. v. CombsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. First National Bank v. EgbersWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. National Bank of the Republic v. BecksteadUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Mills v. HaydenWashington Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API