Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to Conduct of Thorp

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1984No. OSB 81-86, SC 29566PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar filed a complaint against Laurence E. Thorp accusing him of unethical conduct in three separate causes. It alleged that Thorp had violated the Disciplinary Rules of the Oregon State Bar in matters concerning Richard E. Miles, a former client.

The Bar’s complaint is dated September 2,1982. The three member Trial Board found Thorp not guilty of each cause of complaint and recommended to this court that each cause be dismissed. On April 22, 1983, the seven member Disciplinary Review Board concurred in the findings and conclusions of the Trial Board and also recommended that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoivinOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChambersOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BanksOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of GaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BristowOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CarstensOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrandsnessOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API