Legal Opinion
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Schmidt
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 10, 1998No. C6-97-545PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Lael L. Schmidt was admitted to practice law in North Dakota on October 10, 1984, and in Minnesota on October 17, 1984, and has a lengthy disciplinary history in both states. On August 9, 1991, the North Dakota Disciplinary Board placed Schmidt on private probation for one year. 1 On December 18, 1991, he was placed on restricted status in Minnesota for failure to comply with Minnesota’s continuing legal education requirements. On October 1,1992, he was suspended in Minnesota for nonpayment of his attorney registration fee. Schmidt’s restrict ed status has never been lifted, and his…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Matter of Discipline of JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against KossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- In Re the Disciplinary Action Against MorinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against WestbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- In re Disciplinary Action Against WolffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST David A. OVERBOE, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 83318Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against HeinemannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against MeadenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.