Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Heinemann

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 24, 2000No. C2-99-384PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondent Loren Heinemann has been licensed to practice law in Minnesota since 1984. Heinemann has been suspended for nonpayment of the attorney registration fees since April 1, 1985, and is on restricted Continuing Legal Education status. Heinemann has resided in and practiced law in Illinois since 1985. On December 11, 1996, the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (IARDC) filed a complaint against Heinemann. Heinemann answered the complaint, and eventually stipulated to the facts alleged by the IARDC. Heinemann filed a motion requesting that the Illinois…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against EngelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. In Re the Disciplinary Action Against MorinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against ChaconSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Douglas Duane Bahl v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against WolffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against MeadenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against KellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. In re Disciplinary Action Against HawkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API