Legal Opinion
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Meaden
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 28, 2001No. C3-00-1955PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Respondent Charles E. Meaden was admitted to practice law in Minnesota in 1984, but is currently suspended in this state for non-payment of attorney registration fees and is on restricted status for failure to comply with continuing legal education requirements. By order of the New Jersey Supreme Court, dated July 13, 2000, Meaden was suspended from the practice of law in that state for three years, effective August 11, 2000. The Director of Minnesota’s Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director) was notified of Meaden’s New Jersey suspension and has petitioned this court…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against HeinemannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against OtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST David A. OVERBOE, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 83318Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against KellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- In re Disciplinary Action Against HawkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- In Re MeadenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Robert Andrew HUFF, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 283502Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.