Legal Opinion
Abercrombie v. Thomsen
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 24, 1943No. Civ. 6798PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from an order granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The action arose out of a collision between an automobile operated by the deceased husband of plaintiff and a truck operated by defendant.
The plaintiff brought the action as administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband on behalf of herself and their three minor children. The answer of defendant denied the allegations of negligence appearing in the complaint, and charged decedent with contributory negligence; he also filed a cross-complaint charging deceased with negligence. At the conclusion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bartholomae Oil Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Whitfield v. DebrincatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Malloway v. HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Mast v. ClaxtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Hole v. TakekawaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. McCaffreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Pierce v. NashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Scott v. RenzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.