Legal Opinion
Pierce v. Nash
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 20, 1954No. Civ. 19954PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order granting defendants Gaylord Burke and Robert P. Burke a new trial after judgment for plaintiff. The matter was tried by the court without a jury. Defendants did not take a cross-appeal from the judgment.
The action is for damages for constructive eviction of plaintiff, lessee of the premises here involved. The complaint recites that on April 26, 1948, Harry F. Burke leased these premises, by a writing, for a term of five years, to one R. Crawford. The defendants are alleged to be the successors in interest of Harry F. Burke. On about February 21,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Ballard v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Skally v. ShutsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Eatwell v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Agar v. WinslowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Pollock v. MorelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Deseret Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
- Andrews v. Mobile Aire EstatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Kralyevich v. MagriniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Nativi v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.