Legal Opinion

Mast v. Claxton

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 2, 1930No. Docket No. 7138PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEASY, J., pro tem.

Respondent brought this action to recover the sum of $100,000 as damages for personal injuries received by him in a collision between his automobile and the automobile of appellant. The case was tried before a jury, which rendered a verdict in respondent’s favor and against appellant for the sum of $20,000. From the judgment entered on said verdict and from the order denying a new trial this appeal was taken.

Briefly, the essential facts are as follows: Respondent, on the twentieth day of December, 1928, was driving a Dodge automobile in an easterly direction on the highway…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. People v. NakisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Schneider v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Kimic v. San Jose-Los Gatos Interurban Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
  5. People v. GallowayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Bosqui v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Dwelly v. McReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Handley v. LombardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. George v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API