Legal Opinion

Bartholomae Oil Corp. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1941No. L. A. 17895PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

By this proceeding in mandamus petitioner seeks to compel the respondent superior court to vacate a decree and to grant a trial de novo.

In May, 1937, one Lucientes instituted an action in the respondent superior court against the Bartholomae Oil Corporation, petitioner here, to establish a trust interest in certain mining properties and for an accounting. Complaints in intervention were filed by Root and Dalziel, two other claimants to an interest in the trust. The cause was tried before Honorable Everett C. McKeage over a period of sixteen days. On November 14, 1940, Judge McKeage rendered…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Gunder v. GunderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Middleton v. FinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Wiedwald v. DodsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Rogers v. Board of Directors of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Dare v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Sipper v. UrbanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. May v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Rivera v. Division of Industrial WelfareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Black v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API