Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance v. Bah

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 10, 2020No. 3ag/19PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mohamed Alpha Bah, Misc. Docket AG No. 3, September Term, 2019 ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT — DISCIPLINE — DISBARMENT — Respondent Mohamed Alpha Bah violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct 19- 301.1 (Competence), 19-301.2(a) (Scope of Representation), 19-301.3 (Diligence), 19- 301.4 (Communication), 19-301.15(a) and (c) (Safekeeping of Property), 19-301.16(d) (Declining or Terminating Representation), 19-303.2 (Expediting Litigation), 19-305.5(a) (Unauthorized Practice of Law), 19-308.1(b) (Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters), and 19-308.4(a),…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KremerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance v. Smith-ScottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Attorney Grievance v. HoeraufCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Attorney Grievance v. DaileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. Attorney Grievance v. TaniformCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  5. Attorney Grievance v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API