Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance v. Dailey

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 23, 2021No. 6ag/20PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Mitzi Elaine Dailey, AG No. 6, September Term, 2020. Opinion by Getty, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTION – DISBARMENT Respondent, Mitzi Elaine Dailey, violated several provisions of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct (“MARPC”) and the Maryland Rules when she failed to maintain an attorney trust account, failed to act on her client’s case, failed to communicate with her client, abandoned representation of her client, misappropriated client funds, and made intentional misrepresentations to Bar Counsel. Ms. Dailey’s conduct violated…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BleeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. Attorney Grievance v. CassillyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. Attorney Grievance v. TaniformCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  4. Attorney Grievance v. DaleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  5. Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API