Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance v. Smith-Scott

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 29, 2020No. 8ag/18PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Arlene Adasa Smith-Scott, Misc. Docket AG Nos. 8 & 64, September Term, 2018. Opinion by Getty, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE–SANCTION–DISBARMENT Respondent, Arlene Adasa Smith-Scott, violated several provisions of the Maryland Lawyer’s Rules of Professional Conduct (“MLRPC”) and the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct (“MARPC”) through her self-representation before the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland and unrelated representation of Crystal Combs, Angela Plater, Furrah Deeba, Benjamin Thomas, Jr., John Thomas…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. OwrutskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BleeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  2. Attorney Grievance v. MoawadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. Attorney Grievance v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  4. Attorney Grievance v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  5. Attorney Grievance v. DaileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API