Attorney Grievance v. Smith-Scott
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Arlene Adasa Smith-Scott, Misc. Docket AG Nos. 8 & 64, September Term, 2018. Opinion by Getty, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE–SANCTION–DISBARMENT Respondent, Arlene Adasa Smith-Scott, violated several provisions of the Maryland Lawyer’s Rules of Professional Conduct (“MLRPC”) and the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct (“MARPC”) through her self-representation before the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland and unrelated representation of Crystal Combs, Angela Plater, Furrah Deeba, Benjamin Thomas, Jr., John Thomas…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. OwrutskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BleeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Attorney Grievance v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Attorney Grievance v. MoawadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Attorney Grievance v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. DaileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.