Attorney Grievance Commission v. Dore
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.
This case involves a variation on the notorious practice of “robo-signing,” which flourished during the recent foreclosure boom. See Alan M. White, Losing the Paper — Mortgage Assignments, Note Transfers and Consumer Protection, 24 Loy. Consumer L.Rev. 468, 469-70 (2012). “Robo-signing” is a term that “most often refers to the process of mass-producing affidavits for foreclosures without having knowledge *689of or verifying the facts.” Anita Lynn Lapidus, What Really Happened: Ibanez and the Case for Using the Actual Transfer Documents, 41 Stetson L.Rev. 817, 818 (2012).
In the present case, a…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SiskindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Wilson v. HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. FrammCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MixterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.