Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Dore

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 20, 2013No. Misc. Docket AG No. 35PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

This case involves a variation on the notorious practice of “robo-signing,” which flourished during the recent foreclosure boom. See Alan M. White, Losing the Paper — Mortgage Assignments, Note Transfers and Consumer Protection, 24 Loy. Consumer L.Rev. 468, 469-70 (2012). “Robo-signing” is a term that “most often refers to the process of mass-producing affidavits for foreclosures without having knowledge *689of or verifying the facts.” Anita Lynn Lapidus, What Really Happened: Ibanez and the Case for Using the Actual Transfer Documents, 41 Stetson L.Rev. 817, 818 (2012).

In the present case, a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SiskindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Wilson v. HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. FrammCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MixterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API