Attorney Grievance v. Young
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Celio Warren Young, Misc. Docket AG No. 23, September Term, 2019, Opinion by Barbera, C.J. ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT — DISCIPLINE — DISBARMENT — Respondent Celio Warren Young violated Maryland’s Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.8, 1.15, 1.16, 5.5, 7.3, 8.1, and 8.4. These violations principally arose from Respondent’s unauthorized practice of law in Maryland without a license; intentional misrepresentations to his client about the status of his case; failure to properly maintain client funds in an attorney trust account; failure to advise his…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BleeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KremerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Attorney Grievance v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. CulbersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Attorney Grievance v. DaleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.